Monday, June 6, 2011

台灣人20年全面塑化

即使發生像塑化劑和三聚氫銨這樣滅絕自己子孫的事件, 中國人繼續對暴政保持沈默, 對中國文化(像筷子和粽子)讚賞有加.  在台灣的中國人會繼續在選舉時用他的選票來唾棄民主法治, 支持暴政.
one of Taiwan's leading chemicals company used a food additive on a dangerous scale over two decades, threatening the health of innumerable children. ...
And, closely resembling the 2008 scandal in which mainland Chinese company Sanlu added melamine, banned for use in foodstuffs, to baby powder to indicate higher levels of protein, the main victims in the Taiwan case are young children.  ...
Asia Times: Taiwan food scare 'dates back decades' 
By Jens Kastner

TAIPEI - A range of Taiwanese-made food products have been banned in mainland China and South Korea, and recalled in the Philippines, after the discovery that one of Taiwan's leading chemicals company used a food additive on a dangerous scale over two decades, threatening the health of innumerable children. Products involved are also shipped to the United States.

The scandal, involving the use of industrial plasticizer bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) in beverages, jams, syrups, jellies, calcium supplements, multivitamin tablets and other products, recalls the 2008 Chinese melamine scandal in terms of corporate greed and the risk posed to children's health.

Plasticizers such as DEHP are additives that increase a material's plasticity and are used in production of all sorts of useful things, such as leather goods, rainwear, flooring, wiring and cable, food packaging materials and children's toys. Last month, Taiwanese inspectors discovered that Yu Shen Chemical Co, the island's largest emulsifier supplier added DEHP to its clouding agent on a large scale.

Clouding agents, formulated with palm oil or gum arabic, are used to make processed foods look more appealing. When formulated with plasticizers such as DEHP, instead of with expensive palm oil, what's eaten and drunk looks even more tempting, and the chemical furthermore comes with the handy feature that it significantly extends shelf life. The downside to the scam, however, could hardly be any steeper: carcinogen in each contaminated unit inspected by the Taiwanese authorities topped 600 parts per million, exceeding by far the allowable daily intake of the chemical.

And, closely resembling the 2008 scandal in which mainland Chinese company Sanlu added melamine, banned for use in foodstuffs, to baby powder to indicate higher levels of protein, the main victims in the Taiwan case are young children.

Children who consume beverages contaminated with DEHP on a long-term basis are eight times more at risk of developing problems with their reproductive system. The males are more likely to suffer from feminization and shrinking of the penis and testicles when they become adults, girls are facing the prospect of premature development of their sexual organs. Thyroid dysfunction and fertility problems threaten these children later in life.

Another shocking aspect of the worldwide unprecedented DEHP scam is its duration: insiders told investigators that similar practices have been going on for as long as two decades.

Unsurprisingly, the revelations have led to panic among Taiwan's public and government. After an army of inspectors descended on the island's businesses that produce or sell food stuffs, including clinics and pharmacies, the scale of the scandal has become ever more shocking.

  • Prosecutors allege that Yu Shen purchased as much as five tonnes of DEHP every month to make flavor and food coloring agents, selling the products to chemical and food processing factories, as well as to bakeries and pastry shops.
  • A total of 130 food products were confirmed by the Food and Drug Administration to contain DEHP, while 95 manufacturers were found to have used the banned ingredient.
  • A total of 244 ingredient-manufacturing companies, including several renowned brands, were found to have sourced clouding agents from Yu Sheng and Pin Han Perfumery Co, another emulsifier supplier alleged to have carried out a similar scam.
  • A total of 40,000 kilograms of juice and jam, 980,000 bottles of tea drinks and more than 2,000 boxes of powdered probiotic products have been recalled. 
  • 127.5 barrels of emulsifiers have been confiscated. 
  • In Taipei, the sale of 3,448 products for which businesses could not produce certificates was suspended by inspectors.
  • The island's four major convenience store operators - President Chain Store Corp, FamilyMart, OK-Mart and Hi-Life - have pulled all sports drinks from their shelves.

The problem is not limited to Taiwan. The island's DEHP-tainted stuff had been shipped to the United States, mainland China, Hong Kong, the Philippines and Vietnam. After the Department of Health informed health authorities in these countries, Presidential Office spokesman Fang Chiang Tai-chi stated: "The incident has not only caused great public concern, but will also affect the economy and have a negative impact on Taiwan's international reputation."

In terms of direct outfall, his statement at first glance appears to be no exaggeration. Companies are claiming their business has shrunk by 20% due to the scandal. Investors are turning away from food stocks and popular night markets, important for the tourism sector, have also seen sales decline significantly.

Taiwanese beverages, jams, syrups, jellies and other products suspected of DEHP contamination have been banned by South Korea and mainland China, and Manila has ordered an extensive recall of Taiwanese-made food and drink products.

Even so, while desperate Taiwanese parents line up at laboratories, carrying with them the products their children have been sipping for years, Taiwan's food and beverage industry accounts for a mere 4% of the island's domestic manufacturing output, which in turn contributes to about 25% of gross domestic product. In terms of exports, prepared food brought in only US$1.07 billion in 2010, and cosmetics and supplements are not even listed among Taiwan's 16 major export goods.

"The most damage will be done to the catering industry, manufacturers of food and beverages, convenience stores and, for a smaller part, also the pharmaceutical and cosmetics industry," Hu Sheng-Cheng, an academic at Academia Sinica's Institute of Economics, told Asia Times Online. Hu likened the DEHP scandal to a small-to-medium-sized typhoon in terms of economic impact.

"Those sectors' combined annual turnover accounts for NT$900 billion (US$30 billion), and only 10% of them is affected by the DEHP issue. If the scare lasts no longer than a month, the loss will be NT$8 billion to NT$10 billion."

Next to children's health, it is the public's trust in the government and in the "Made in Taiwan" brand that will be most negatively affected, he said.

And while some companies are being hit by the scandal, others can profit, according Huang Li-hsuan, professor at Taiwan's National Central University's Department of Economics.

"Because most of the products involved in the DEHP scandal are essentials and part of the Taiwanese public's daily lives, consumers' flexibility isn't high," Huang said. "So if we say DEHP decreases sales of this and that product, such as soft drinks, the public will use other related products like fresh juice, mineral water, and so on, as a substitute. In other words, in the short term, DEHP will make some businesses do worse but others better."

The danger of the DEHP scandal denting Taiwan's international reputation, as suggested by the Presidential Office spokesman, is also slim, according to Gary Rawnsley, a professor of Asian International Communications at the University of Leeds.

Rawnsley, an expert on public diplomacy and soft power, dismissed the notion that Taiwan's image abroad could suffer anywhere as much as China's in 2008 due to the melamine scandal.

"China's scandals have certainly been more prominent because they are Chinese and China garners far more media attention across the world than Taiwan", he said. The DEHP scandal "will have an effect on the manufacturers but not on Taiwan's image among the public around the world. The reason for that is it is not news here [in the UK] or elsewhere as far as I can see."

Jens Kastner is a Taipei-based journalist.

Saturday, May 28, 2011

石之瑜這樣的台大教授
能教育出什麼樣的學生?


石之瑜是台大政治系教授, 又是中評社的特約作者.

石之瑜大辣辣地列名為中國共產黨中評社的傭兵, 豈不就是敲鑼打鼓地說他是迫害人類的幫手?

如果台大政治系教授石之瑜 對台灣的自由, 民主, 法治, 人權, 及做人的尊嚴和價值 (or lack of) 有興趣, 他應分析蔡英文 2012 的當選能給台灣人的基本人權帶來什麼改進.

在台灣, 幾乎沒有人把蔡英文的當選跟台灣獨立連想在一起.  為什麼石之瑜要?  我猜是因為他可以避開自由, 民主, 法治, 人權這些真正重要的議題.  並且當他把蔡英文跟台獨扯在一起時, 他希望台灣人民想到中國的飛彈而選馬英九.

從他文章短短第一段就可以看出他的思想多麼混亂.  一個支持獨裁暴政, 思想混亂的台大政治系教授會教出什麼樣的學生?  他說
蔡 ... 又不接受現行“憲法”的正當性
你接受嗎? 中國和西藏是台灣的領土嗎?  (See
Taiwanese living absurdly.)  你既然接受現行“憲法”的正當性, 為什麼為憲法打引號?  請解釋你的僱主中國共產黨統治中國有什麼正當性.  是誰給了中國共產黨統治中國的權力?
“中華民國”只是個流亡政府
如果不是, 又是什麼?   它為什麼逃離首都南京?
如果它不是流亡到台灣, 它在台灣度假嗎? 
若蔡英文有朝一日主政,在她治理下的大陸政策 ...
一個政治學教授不知道台灣的大陸 mainland 是台灣, 不是中國嗎?
石之瑜:認識深居簡出的小英台獨性格
 
中評社台北5月25日電(特約作者 石之瑜)外界對蔡英文的政治性格感到撲朔迷離,但她否定“中華民國”只是個流亡 政府,又不接受現行“憲法”的正當性,因此她對於台獨的執著則為各方逐漸認識。若蔡英文有朝一日主政,在她治理下的大陸政策,會如何反應她的台獨思維呢?  

從早期參與“港澳關係條例”制定時鍵入各種安全閥的設計,到襄助李登輝發表兩岸之間為“特殊的國與國關係論”,再到說服陳水扁收回他甫就職後關於九二共識的談話,之後並建立所謂兩岸關係間的“國家安全”網,可以看到蔡英文堅定而超越的面對大陸,寸步不讓。

然而,蔡英文迄今似不曾在幕前或幕後設想過台獨時間表、“台灣獨立”的“建國”步驟、對大陸進行國際鬥爭的美印日台聯盟,甚至沒有聽到她對台獨前景美好的各種空想理論予以積極回應,也沒有聽到她對中國威脅論的鼓吹捧場,更沒有幸災樂禍地協助散發中國崩潰論的習性。...

(中評社特約作者石之瑜,台灣大學政治學系教授)
As an exercise for the readers, please do a Google search for 石之瑜  or 石之瑜 自由 民主 and ponder on the results.

Wednesday, May 25, 2011

阿明: 中國媒體 184/196 171/178

中國國務院台灣事務辦公室新聞局局長楊毅在開幕式致辭:
今年是兩岸關係和平發展的關鍵一年。作為社會公器和民意的守望者,兩岸媒體應順應歷史發展潮流,善盡媒體責任,共同維護兩岸關係和平發展得來不易的良好局 面,共同營造有利於兩岸關係和平發展的輿論環境,共同推動兩岸關係沿著正確的方向前進,共同防止兩岸關係和平發展出現倒退、受到破壞。 
這代表中國文化的最顯著:  面對著全世界 漫不經心地指鹿為馬, 大辣辣地撒謊及毫無羞恥心地說些完全沒有意義的話. 


阿明說: 台灣媒體幹嘛要跟中國媒體合作, 神經病

5/25/11: Yesterday, on 中天新聞they aired a report on Taiwanese media (台灣媒體) possibly cooperating with chinese media (中國媒體). What!? china ...
by ahbying

Monday, May 23, 2011

趙高 (200 BC): 指鹿為馬
南方朔 (2012): 馬英九是好人

南方朔, 請你先看看這裏搜集的 youTube 影片.   然
後解釋為什麼馬英九是一個好人.
Hint: 他先在電視機前說我們全家都没有綠卡, 然後又對着電視機說我有綠卡.  他回答顏聖冠議會質詢時說他沒有把公款存進私人帳戶, 但在法庭裏又改口承認.
南方朔:馬英九是個好人,但真的不是個好領導
馬英九總統已執政滿3週年,知名評論家南方朔接受專訪指出,不敢有主張的人,就是風吹這邊就往這邊擺,風吹那邊就往那邊擺,這種風格,在馬英九身上,看得太清楚了;所以,他認為馬英九是個好人,可是馬英九真的不是一個好領導。

南方朔5月16日才在台灣競爭力論壇舉辦的「馬英九執政3週年總檢討─經濟篇」研討會上,痛斥經濟的復甦無感,結構性失業也越來越嚴重,「我認為,這一個內心非常恐懼,每天不知道幹嘛的這個總統,應該要檢討!」

南方朔表示,馬政府執政3年多來,把大陸當作賺錢市場,這點做得還不錯,但其他部分台灣老百姓完全不能接受,因為「無感復甦」絕對是大多數老百姓的聲音,這也是為什麼國民黨今天整個選舉選得「二二六六」、亂七八糟,也是有道理的。

南方朔指出,一個國家要維持完整性,必須產生足夠的認同邏輯,然後有很多邏輯同時運作,如果只靠一個邏輯,就不足以成為一個國家。

南方朔也強調,政府將ECFA當作是一大神話,造成台灣每個人都說ECFA有多麼偉大,但實際上ECFA實行到現在1年了,卻沒有出現什麼正面效 應,反而是出現一大堆未來會有後續、負面效應的問題。他說,「對ECFA重新反省和檢討,恐怕是馬總統就職3週年,台灣朝野應該去思考的問題。」

南方朔接受《自由時報》專訪指出,「一個領導人自己必須要有核心思想,一個具有核心思想的人,可以找到好的團隊,縱使是一個普通的團隊,也可以透過好的領導,變成很厲害的團隊;一個很差的領導,就是給你很強的團隊,也會莫之所以。」

南方朔表示,不敢有主張的人,就是風吹這邊就往這邊擺,風吹那邊就往那邊擺,這種風格,在馬英九身上,看得太清楚了;所以,馬英九是個好人,他不敢否認,可是馬英九真的不是一個好領導。

南方朔還說,一個沒有核心價值的人物,事實上就是永遠在唬弄各方的人,在唬弄台灣老百姓,又在唬弄北京,唬弄到最後,會穿幫的,一定兩邊都罩不住;「我覺得這次的WHA事件,就是北京對他不客氣了。」

Saturday, May 21, 2011

馬英九演講 主權施政成績
邱文達搖尾抗議世衛

中央日報社評----兩岸和平是台灣的最大資產
今天是馬英九總統就職三週年,他以「主權、人權、環保權」為主軸向國人提出施政成績單,這也標誌著他的政權保衛戰從這天起正式開打。 國家領導人的評價當然好壞不一,
捍衛主權的邱文達在五分鐘的演講裏說我的國家叫中華台北.
就像剝奪了台灣人公投權的馬英九暢談人權,
嚴重抗議WHO的邱文達說他很榮幸, 很謝謝.
Taiwan health minister's speech at World Health Assembly
Focus Taiwan News Channel
Taipei, May 18 (CNA) Taiwan's Health Minister Chiu Wen-ta made a five-minute speech at the 64th World Health Assembly (WHA) in Geneva, Switzerland, Wednesday. In his address, he reiterated Taiwan's efforts to promote international health cooperation ...

中國國民黨剝奪了台灣人公投權
馬英九卻演講人權施政成績

中央日報社評----兩岸和平是台灣的最大資產
5 小時前
今天是馬英九總統就職三週年,他以「主權、人權、環保權」為主軸向國人提出施政成績單,這也標誌著他的政權保衛戰從這天起正式開打。 國家領導人的評價當然好壞不一, ...

Chinese KMT strips away Taiwanese' referendum rights 中國國民黨剝奪人民的公投權

Wednesday, May 18, 2011

一張中國國民黨鐵票的故事


 ... 一般的女子可能是「望夫成龍」,但對於熱切盼望台灣能獨立建國,先生是新住民(外省)第二代的我,則是「望夫效法陳師孟教授及金恆煒總編那般愛台灣」,然而十八年努力下來發現似乎並不容易!從阿扁選兩次的台北市長(1994 & 1998),夫妻就吵架;但阿扁選兩次的總統(2000 & 2004),他竟投票給了阿扁,我以為自己成功,先生的意識形態因為我的影響,已經由藍轉綠,跟我一樣鐵板一塊了,所以2008年我放心地隨台教會出征,前去東台灣「逆風行腳」。
  但大選後第五天(3月26日),猶沉溺於敗選傷痛的我,不禁發出心中的疑問:「兩張公投票加一張總統大選的單子,不過蓋三個圈,投票那天你為何圈選了許久呢?」先生告訴我,兩張公投票他都蓋同意(這要感謝大話新聞節目),但總統大選的單子,他用筆在馬英九的部份打上29分,謝長廷的部份則打上39分,我答:「那不就是廢票嗎?」先生無語。我卻像洩了氣的皮球般跌坐在椅子上,整顆心糾結一起,唉!心痛無比,雙重的挫敗感!原來在前線作戰的我,家中失火了還不自知;而且,自己家中的票都沒顧好,竟然還跑去東台灣拉票呢!別人知道了會如何想呢?所以我不敢告訴別人,只能跟視同姊姊的秀娟主任傾訴而已;而且我總不能因為先生沒投票給謝長廷就鬧離婚吧!只好退而求其次地「無言」(不講話)!在那段「無言」的日子裏,我就像行屍走肉般,直到端午節(6月8日)那天,因為秀娟主任的勸告,我才蒸了兩顆粽子給先生吃,並開口跟他說話。自然對於先生投廢票的舉動,我思考了許久,我想當時財大氣粗的中國國民黨砸錢拍了五十多支廣告,攻擊、詆毀民進黨無所不用其極,先生只要一打開電視當受影響的,所以在他心中,民進黨便與國民黨一樣爛了!...